The Uncomfortable Legacy of Colonel General Ludwig Beck

“It is a lack of character and insight, when a soldier in high command sees his duty and mission only in the context of his military orders without realizing that the highest responsibility is to the people of his country.” Ludwig Beck

Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-C13564,_Ludwig_BeckLudwig Beck  Bundesarchiv Foto

This is one of those uncomfortable posts to write partially because I know that some people will take it completely wrong or ascribe meaning to it that I do not intend. I by training am a military historian, probably better at that than I am theology.  One thing that fascinates me in the study of military history is the actions of men in the face of evil and the meetings of such people at the intersections of where military and government policy intersect.  It is a timeless theme. The bulk of my study until the past few years was the German Army, particularly that of the Weimar Republic and the Wehrmacht to include policies, leaders, political attitudes and behavior in war and peace. Thus it makes sense for me to look at Colonel General Ludwig Beck who held the post of Chief of the German General Staff during the early part of the Nazi era.

Ludwig Beck is one of those characters in military history that makes professional military officers uncomfortable.  Beck is not the perfect example of righteousness nor was he always correct in things that he supported.  As an artillery regiment commander he defended the rights of soldiers and officers to be Nazi Party members though he himself was not one.  He, like many military officers was a conservative military officer by nature and became Chief of Staff of the Wehrmacht in 1935 two years after Hitler’s ascension to power.  Taking office Beck was troubled by some Nazi policies but not by the need for Germany to expand to areas that it had once controlled, he opposed the plan to attack Czechoslovakia not because of any love for the Czech state which he desired to be eliminated, but rather it being a war that Germany could not win. He resigned from his position a Chief of Staff in 1938 when he could not persuade the rest of the General Staff to resign in protest over Hitler’s plan which he felt would be disastrous for Germany.  Had the western powers led by Neville Chamberlain not caved at Munich it is likely that the Germans would have suffered badly against the Czech army and fortifications and with the entry of France into the war would have suffered a defeat that would have ended the Hitler regime.  In fact German officers who saw the extent of Czech preparations on the frontier following the Munich deal were greatly relieved that they did not have to fight their way into the Czech state.

After his resignation Beck played a key role in the resistance movement. He was involved in the planning for a number of attempts on Hitler’s life. Yet it was his leadership in the July 20th 1944 attempt on the life of Hitler that ensured his place in history.  With Colonel Klaus Von Stauffenberg and others in the General Staff at the Front and in Germany he acted to avert further destruction in Europe and the certain destruction of Germany.  The plot, Operation Valkyrie was marred by poor execution and failed to kill Hitler of seize power but for a few hours. The planners had left too much to chance and once Hitler had restored communications the coup attempted ended swiftly.  Had the attempt succeeded Beck was in line to become either the leader of Germany or the Head of the Army.  Instead while being interrogated after his capture he took his own life depriving Nazi leaders of the ability to put him up for a public trial at which he would have been humiliated and then executed.  The Kasserne in Sonthofen where the Bundeswehr MP School and Staff School as well as NATO and EU military schools are located is named for him.  It is there, ironically a former Adolf Hitler School that his memory and sacrifice is honored by the nation which emerged from the rubble of World War Two.  He is honored in a small museum and with a plaque recognizing his sacrifice.

492Ludwig Beck Kasserne Sonthofen

The reason that General Beck makes many of us in uniform uncomfortable (and I do include myself) is that he recognized that senior officers, especially those in high command who help set and execute policy cannot isolate themselves in the purely military aspects of the operations.  Instead he believed that officers have a higher duty to the constitution and people and not just the military mission that they have been assigned.  When he realized that he could not stop Hitler’s invasion of Czechoslovakia he resigned and worked in the obscurity of a small and often divided resistance movement against Hitler.  The bulk of the German high command, including many officers idolized in the United States did not recognize the higher duty. Many of these men were consummate professionals who did not support the evil of the Nazi regime and who conducted themselves honorably. Yet they effectively abetted its crimes by not opposing actions of their government that were against international law and morality as well as dangerous from purely a pragmatic military standpoint.

The problem is that military officers in any nation, including ours can face situations such as Beck faced.  A military’s character is demonstrated in how leaders deal with such situations.  Beck recognized the situation early, the bulk of his fellow officers did not recognize a problem until Germany was embroiled in a war that it could no longer win.  Even then most could not mount an opposition to Hitler because they did not want to be considered to be mutineers and violate their oath.  The potential to abet evil when military professionals bury their heads by planning and executing purely military aspects of a campaign is great.  If they ignore questionable policy or even policies that they know that have been judged by the international community to be illegal or immoral, such as torture of prisoners or waging wars of aggression against countries that have not attacked their nation they become complicit in their nations crimes.  This was the case with German Officers who may not have committed any personal crime and even tried to mitigate the evils of the Nazi regime were morally complicit in that evil.

In the United States the military shows its fidelity by remembering our oath to the Constitution and being faithful to it and the people that we serve.  As officers we represent all Americans and not just those of our political party, religious faith or social or economic interests, nor any political leader, faction or interest group within the nation. The Constitution, our military regulations, traditions and the Uniform Code of Military Justice are the standard by which we operate and by which we conduct ourselves and tools that protect us when policies or actions taken by the government or people within it violate those codes or international law.  The UCMJ makes it clear those officers who take part in, plan or a complicit in illegal actions in war are committing crimes.

When a nation become involved in wars which are non-traditional, revolutionary wars or insurgencies that barriers to professional conduct can be broken down. The Mai Lai massacre committed by 2LT William Calley’s platoon with the certain knowledge and maybe even approval of individuals in the chain of command is one example as were the uncontrolled chaos of prisoner abuse and torture at Abu Ghraib.

Times are difficult and we do not know what the future brings.  Stress in societies caused by economic conditions, natural disasters, lawlessness on the streets and divided and ineffective governments sometimes remove the moral restraints of the society and even affect the military.  One sees this in Weimar Germany as well as the 4th Republic in France which had to deal with post World War II economic difficulties, exacerbated by recriminations of political opponents for actions the others did during the war while France was occupied by Germany as well as the wars in Indo-China and Algeria which further divided the nation and the military.

It is in stressful and uncertain times that officers have to be men and women of principle who always uphold the highest traditions of their military as well as be the voice of conscience when governments, political parties, special interests or leaders begin to violate international norms in the conduct of war. Beck was not a perfect officer. He supported some of Hitler’s policies until after his resignation but like much of the resistance believed that the Nazi regime could only end up destroying Germany.  It is important to remember that like Ludwig Beck that officers do not need to sacrifice their honor to be faithful to their oath.

Peace, Steve+


Filed under History, leadership, Military, national security, world war two in europe

16 responses to “The Uncomfortable Legacy of Colonel General Ludwig Beck

  1. Fr. David

    Not every war violation is as grand or obvious as some of the Nazi problems.

    Consider the possibility of a young 2nd Lt who crosses the line conducting a field interrogation—something he is not even authorized to do. No permanent damage is done to the individual being questioned and the Lt does not persist in such behavior. If it is dealt with via official means a relatively minor infraction will be exploited by our enemies, it will most likely be blown out of proportion, the young officer and his chain of command will likely pay a price that is disproportional to his indiscretions, hundreds-if not thousands-of man hours of work will go into dealing with the situation. This is just a few of the impacts of officially dealing with a violation of ROE and UCMJ.

    Yet there may be a violation of the UCMJ, ROE and other Orders as well as a wrong ethical decisions that need to be accounted for.

    How to deal with such a situation may seem clear from back here, but in the “fog of war” it is not as easy as black and white.


  2. padresteve

    Reblogged this on Padresteve's World…Musings of a Passionate Moderate and commented:

    I have been under the weather the past couple of days with a really nasty sinus infection that has totally sapped my strength. I have been wanting to write something dealing with the current situation regarding the Sexual Abuse scandals and other leadership crisis that seem to be overwhelming the military even as we continue to fight a war in Afghanistan, deal with challenges necessitated by budget cuts and the real threat of involvement in even other wars. I will get around to that, but one thing I do want to post is an older article about German Colonel General Ludwig Beck who died in the attempt to overthrow Hitler. I think that there are lessons for military professionals to learn from this, especially those that in a closed institution have become distanced from the people that the come from and Constitution that they are sworn to support and defend. Hopefully I will feel more like writing something new tomorrow or over the weekend. Peace, Padre Steve+

  3. Thanks for this post I’ve only been introduced to Col. General Beck through the Tom Cruise movie Valkyrie and I’m glad I found this post on google since I can’t seem to find any other info about him.

    I’m wondering if anyone has ever written a book on the man himself?

    • William Shirer has a great deal of info, some taken directly from Beck’s diaries in his book “The rise and fall of the third Reich”. I found his book to be a very revealing look at the machinations of the Nazi empire. It’s very difficult to find the original editions, but I’m guessing they have been transcribed to the internet by now.

      • padresteve

        Mike, Shirer is a fantastic writer. I have read all of his major works. Besides Rise and Fall I recommend Berlin Diary, The Nightmare Years, and The Collapse of the Third Republic, an Inquiry into the Fall of France in 1940. The last one should be required reading in the United States. Too many similarities.

  4. Courtney Anderson

    Beck did not commit suicide. After two failed suicide shots, he was finally shot by the Nazis.

    • padresteve

      The same effect was had.

      • Ahmed Khan

        He was not shot by the Nazis but executed by army soldiers on order from General Fromm. Hitler wanted the conspirators to be taken alive!

      • padresteve

        You are correct, but Fromm did it to hide his involvement. Hitler wanted the conspirators dead, but only after humiliating them in public show trials and then brutally executing them and in some cases imprisoning their family members. You seem awfully upset about this, especially as a Canadian. Do you have some kind of man crush on Hitler that you have to make it look like he wanted to keep these men alive because he was such a humanitarian. But I’ll bet that you are a Holocaust denier, or someone who likes what Hitler did to the Jews. So take your anti-Semitic ass off of my site and keep it in Toronto. I have no tolerance for Nazi apologists and lovers. Make another comment and I will block you.

  5. kalman

    just a minor mistake. “Instead while being interrogated after his capture he took his own life depriving Nazi leaders of the ability to put him up for a public trial at which he would have been humiliated and then executed.”
    i read in the rise and fall of the third Reich. that Beck was given a pistol to kill himself but he failed to do so twice! when they saw that he couldn’t do it, then they executed him. i do not know what page it was on.

    • padresteve

      He took the shot and failed. Was finished off by a soldier loyal to Hitler. In this case Shirer, who I really like was wrong. But thanks for your comment!

      • David Browne

        Shirer is a great read, and pulls together so much detail into a meaningful whole, but he got details wrong. He wrote fairly early before further scholarship fleshed out details, and I have had a sense that he was more of a journalist than a historian, and wrote with that perspective.

      • padresteve

        That is so true. He was immersed in the story and didn’t have all the facts.

  6. Thank you padresteve, I’m embarking on a new literary voyage thanks to your recommendation. Its almost uncanny that you recommended a book related to France’s fall. I have just read a short article called “How France fell in six days” and that was already starting to pique my curiosity. Interesting the parallels one finds when studying historical events. Again, thank you and “Cheers”!

  7. “In fact German officers who saw the extent of Czech preparations on the frontier following the Munich deal were greatly relieved that they did not have to fight their way into the Czech state.”

    This is not true. Beck and companion were in fact upset about the Munich deal. They had prepared a coup and convinced the British to declared war, so that they could use it as an excuse to overthrow Hitler. Until the end of the war, many of them still blamed the British for this.

    • padresteve

      I have written about the Oster plot and the others including Beck who were part of it. The Generals I am referring to in this were the ones who would have had to assault the positions, not the plotters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s