Friends of Padre Steve’s World,
I am continuing to write about the invasion of Iraq in 2003, an invasion that by any standard of measure fit the definition of War Crimes as defined by the American who headed the prosecution of the major Nazi War Criminals at Nuremberg. Justice Robert Jackson stated in his opening:
“If certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.” Justice Robert Jackson International Conference on Military Trials, London, 1945, Dept. of State Pub.No. 3080 (1949), p.330.
In March 2003 I like many of us on active duty at the time saw the nation embark on a crusade to overthrow an admittedly thuggish criminal head of state, Saddam Hussein. The images of the hijacked airliners crashing into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were still relatively fresh in our minds. The “evidence” that most of us had “seen,” the same that most Americans and people around the world were shown led many of us to believe that Saddam was involved in those attacks in some manner and that he posed a threat to us.
Now it wasn’t that we didn’t have doubts about it or even the wisdom of invading Iraq. It didn’t matter that there was also credible evidence that maybe what we were being told was not correct, and it didn’t matter that some of our closest allies voted against a mandate to invade Iraq in the United Nations Security Council. We were emotionally charged by the events of 9-11 and “we knew” that Saddam was a “bad guy.” We also believed that we could not be defeated. We had defeated the Iraqis in 1991 and we were stronger and they weaker than that time.
We really didn’t know much about Iraq, its history, people, culture and certainly we paid little attention to the history of countries that had invaded and occupied Iraq in the past. T.E. Lawrence, the legendary Lawrence of Arabia wrote in August of 1920 about his own country’s misbegotten invasion and occupation of Iraq, or as it was known then Mesopotamia.
“The people of England have been led in Mesopotamia into a trap from which it will be hard to escape with dignity and honour. They have been tricked into it by a steady withholding of information. The Bagdad communiqués are belated, insincere, incomplete. Things have been far worse than we have been told, our administration more bloody and inefficient than the public knows. It is a disgrace to our imperial record, and may soon be too inflamed for any ordinary cure. We are to-day not far from a disaster.”
The sad thing is that the same could have been written of the United States occupation by 2004.
But even more troubling than the words of Lawrence are the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials. Somehow as a historian who has spent a great deal of time studying the Nazi period and its aftermath I cannot help but look back in retrospect and wonder what Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson and the other Nuremberg prosecutors would have done had they had some of our leaders in the dock instead of the Nazis.
In his opening statement before the tribunal Jackson spoke words about the the Nazi plan for war that could apply equally to that to the United States in 2002 and 2003:
“This war did not just happen-it was planned and prepared for over a long period of time and with no small skill and cunning.”
The indictments against the Nazis at Nuremberg are chilling if we were to be held to the same standard that we held the Nazis leaders at Nuremberg. True, we did not have massive death camps or exterminate millions of defenseless people, nor did we run slave labor factories, but we did like they launched a war of aggression under false pretense against a country that had not attacked us.
At Nuremberg we charged twenty top Nazi political officials, as well as police and high ranking military officers with war crimes. The indictments included:
Count One: Conspiracy to Wage Aggressive War: This count addressed crimes committed before the war began, showing a plan by leaders to commit crimes during the war.
Count Two: Waging Aggressive War, or “Crimes Against Peace” which included “the planning, preparation, initiation, and waging of wars of aggression, which were also wars in violation of international treaties, agreements, and assurances.”
Count Three: War Crimes. This count encompassed the more traditional violations of the law of war already codified in the Geneva and Hague Conventions including treatment of prisoners of war, slave labor, and use of outlawed weapons.
Count Four: Crimes Against Humanity, which covered the actions in concentration camps and other death rampages.
While count four, Crimes Against Humanity would be difficult if not impossible to bring to trial because there was nothing in the US and Coalition war in Iraq that remotely compares to that of what the Nazis were tried, some US and British leaders could probably have been successful prosecuted by Jackson and the other prosecutors under counts one through three.
The fact is that none of the reasons given for the war by the Bush Administration were demonstrated to be true. Senior US and British officials knowing this could be tried and very probably convicted on counts one and two. We also know that some military and intelligence personnel have been convicted of crimes that would fall under count three.
Saddam Hussein was a war criminal. He was also a brutal dictator who terrorized and murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people. But we went to war over his alleged ties to Al Qaeda and WMDs and he had not attacked us. Looking back at history and using the criteria that we established at Nuremberg I have no doubt that had Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld been in the dock that Justice Jackson would have destroyed them and the court would have convicted them.
So 15 years later we need to ask hard questions. The war cost nearly 5000 US military personnel dead, 32,000 wounded, over 100,000 afflicted with PTSD, and other spiritual and psychological injuries; an estimated 22 veterans committing suicide every day. Somewhere between 1 and 2 trillion dollars were spent, helping to bankrupt the nation. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis were killed, wounded and displaced from their homes; their country was destroyed and they have not recovered. Yet somehow those that decided to take us to war roam free. They write books defending their actions and appear on “news” programs hosted by their media allies who 15 years ago helped manipulate the American public, still traumatized by the events of 9-11-2001 to support the war.
Despite all of this and the passage of 15 years with which to reflect a new poll revealed that some 43% of Americans still believe that the war was worth it.
Saddam and many of his henchmen are dead or rotting in Iraqi prisons for their crimes against the Iraqi people. However good this may be one has to ask if how it happened was legal or justified under US or International Law, if it was worth the cost in blood, treasure or international credibility. Likewise why have none of the men and women who plotted, planned and launched the war been held the standard that we as a nation helped establish and have used against Nazi leaders and others?
If we cannot ask that and wrestle with this then we as a nation become no better than the Germans who sought to minimize their responsibility for the actions of their leaders. If we downplay, minimize, or deny our responsibility regarding Iraq we will most certainly enable future leaders to feel that they can do the same with impunity. That is a terrible precedent and one that may very well lead us into disaster.
Today we have a President who may very well act on his worst instincts and thrust the nation into even worse wars. To ensure that war occurs Trump fired General H.R. McMaster yesterday as his National Security Advisor and replaced him with John Bolton. Bolton is one of the most responsible and unapologetic of the Iraq War planners and he has made multiple attacks on the International Criminal Court, a court established in light of Nuremberg. He should be rotting as a war criminal rather than be appointed as National Security Advisor. This is truly a lawless and reprehensible regime that will destroy the United States and bring disaster upon the world.
26 responses to ““If certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes…” Reflections on the Invasion of Iraq in Light of Nuremberg”
Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.
“It didn’t matter that there was also credible evidence that maybe what we were being told was not correct, and it didn’t matter that some of our closest allies voted against a mandate to invade Iraq in the United Nations Security Council.
We were emotionally charged by the events of 9-11 and “we knew” that Saddam was a “bad guy.”
We also believed that we could not be defeated.”
In this short quotation I regognize the American Exeptionalism mantra:
We are right!
Believe what your are told!
Historical context lacking!
Critism is treason, uttering it you are un-American and a traitor!
Donn’t listen to the opinions of other nations
Don’t accept the international instutions decissions; who were created for international dialogue and decissionmaking!
Placing yourself above international law!
American Exceptionalism in any shape of form, big or smaal it still plays havock with the US and the rest of the world.
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol—Killing Civilians Is a Crime – Critical News Autoblog
Pingback: The Scotfree | From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol, Killing Civilians Is a Crime
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol, Killing Civilians is a Crime
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol, Killing Civilians Is a Crime
Pingback: From Mosul To Raqqa To Mariupol, Killing Civilians Is A Crime – 🏴 Anarchist Federation
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol, Killing Civilians is a Crime | Change-Links
Pingback: Killing Civilians, from Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol - Yerepouni Daily News
Pingback: Dari Mosul ke Raqqa ke Mariupol, membunuh warga sipil adalah kejahatan | BeritaNow
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol, Killing Civilians is a Crime – Stop the Wars at Home and Abroad!
Pingback: Washington Is the Worst Mass Murderer of Civilians in History | TRUTH11.COM
Pingback: Will Russia's war crimes in Ukraine convince the U.S. to consider its recent past? - NEWS TV USA
Pingback: Will Russia's war crimes in Ukraine convince the U.S. to consider its recent past? - planetcirculate
Pingback: Will Russia's war crimes in Ukraine convince the U.S. to consider its recent past? - TC
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol, Killing Civilians Is a CrimeSouth Front
Pingback: Will Russia’s war crimes in Ukraine convince the U.S. to consider its recent past? – Uromi Voice
Pingback: Will Russia's war crimes in Ukraine convince the U.S. to consider its recent past? - News around the world
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol, Killing Civilians Is a Crime - SHOAH
Pingback: Att döda civila: Från USA:s insatser i Mosul till Raqqa och till Mariupol - Global Politics
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol, Killing Civilians is A Crime - Maeeshat
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol, Killing Civilians Is a Crime | HUMAN WRONGS WATCH
Pingback: From Mosul and Raqqa to Mariupol and Bucha, Killing Civilians Is a Crime - Global Talk Corner
Pingback: Van Mosul en Raqqa tot Marioepol en Bucha, het doden van burgers is een misdaad - INDIGNATIE
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol—Killing Civilians Is a Crime | MLToday
Pingback: From Mosul to Raqqa to Mariupol – OVALmedia new