“Bloody Savo” Is the U.S. Navy Ready for a Beat Down Today?

USS_Quincy_CA-39_savo

                         USS Quincy under Attack off Savo Island 

[Note: Updated 15 August 2020 in regard to the erroneous account of Rear Admiral Samuel Elliot Morrison regarding Australian Scout Planes which was repeated in every American history of the battle until it was refuted by the U.S. Navy’s Historical Branch in 2014.] 


Friends of Padre Steve’s World,

Tonight I am going back to my World War II vault and reposting an older article about the Battle Of Savo Island off Guadalcanal. It was the most lopsided defeat in modern American Naval history. It happened a long time ago and in an age where the United States Navy has not lost a ship in combat, other to mines since August 6th 1945.

Since the latter part of the Cold War when the Soviets Red Navy under Admiral Sergey Gorshkov began to become true threat. In fact it became a threat to our plans to defend Western Europe through its submarine force, its growing surface force, and its integration with Soviet Naval Aviation Tu-16 Badger and Tu-22 Backfire bombers armed with conventional or nuclear air to ship cruise missiles, or Tu-16s equipped for EW, ASW, or Reconnaissance missions. One possible scenario was played out in Tom Clancy’s Cold War thriller, “Red Storm Rising.” In a successful attack by Badgers and Backfires the USS Nimitz was heavily damaged and knocked out of action by two missile hits, the French Carrier Foch was sunk by multiple hits, USS Saipan LHA-2 with over 2500 Marines and Sailors embarked was blown up and sank with only 200 survivors, in addition the USS Ticonderoga CG-47 heavily damaged and put out of action. The Soviets used deception and a saturation attack by anti-ship missiles that overwhelmed our defenses. I was an Army officer serving in Germany when the book was published and it was frightening, because even though the United States and our NATO allies prevailed, it was a great cost, and had it occurred my unit would have been likely chewed to pieces in the Battle for Germany. 

However, since the end of the Cold War we got lazy, with the fall of the Soviet Union we reduced the size of our fleet by massive numbers and then got involved in a series of small wars which wore out ships, and aircraft faster than programmed, and resulted in the early decommissioning of 30 ships, and reduction of 30,000 sailors to fund the war in Iraq. These wars caused additional funding shortages, which were made much worse by the Republican shutdown of Congress which resulted in great sequester of spending that impacted every government agency.

This included a military that was still at war and a massive backlog of maintenance, and replacement of ships. This was compounded by the costly Zumwalt Class “destroyers” which became so that only three of twelve were built, and now the Navy is trying to figure out a mission for them. Likewise, the Littoral Combat Ship or LCS program was promoted as an inexpensive heavily armed and versatile “street fighter.” Unfortunately it came in massively over budget, under armed, incapable of operating with or protecting Carrier Strike Groups, or Expeditionary Strike Groups, and plagued by numerous and often embarrassing maintenance failures. Like the Zumwalt’s the Navy is trying to figure out what to due with them. The USS Gerald Ford Class carriers, the designed replacements for the Nimitz Class are so expensive and plagued with ongoing issues of their new and innovative systems are so bad that the Navy is openly questioning if enough can be built to replace the Nimitz Class Ships. The Ford, though commissioned in 2018, has not deployed and probably will not deploy until 2022.

It seems that we forgotten to remember that should a war break out with a near-peer competitor, like the Chinese Communists or the Russians in waterers where they can gain local superiority, or even regional powers such as Iran which could use asymmetric means of large numbers of small missile equipped ships and attack boats, costal submarines, and land based anti-ship missiles in “swarm attacks” to overwhelm technologically superior American ships in confined waters. We have come close to losing major ships, the cruiser USS Princeton and Helicopter Carrier USS Tripoli, to very primitive moored mines during the First Gulf War, the USS Ruben James to a mine during the tanker wars, and the USS Stark which was hit by Iraqi Exocet anti-ship missiles in 1987. Likewise we have come close to losing the Guided Missile destroyers USS Cole (Terrorist attack), USS John S. McCain and USS Fitzgerald (avoidable collisions with merchant ships), and finally, and perhaps the most disturbing, the fire aboard the USS Bonhomme Richard last month that was so catastrophic that it is quite likely the ship will ever be repaired to her former mission requirements, and her replacement costs will be more than we can afford.

I won’t go into the destruction of the relationships that the Trump administration has caused with the nation’s whose navies we depend on to help us sustain overseas operations in Europe and the Pacific, nor the dearth of shipbuilding, repair, and dry-docking facilities in the United States needed to produce and repair warships in peace, and even more importantly in war. 

We have been lucky. We won’t be as lucky in a real live shootout today. Ships will be lost, damaged, and sailors will die. Compounding the problem for the United States is that years of focus on Iraq and Afghanistan, failed experiments with reducing crew size (smart-ship), reductions in numbers of ships and sailors to satisfy the budgets needs to the unnecessary invasion of Iraq, and the stress put on remaining ships and aircraft have worn us down. Readiness rates remain down, and we no longer have the shipbuilding and repair facilities to replace losses and repair damaged ships, especially in a war with China. There currently are no answers to this. 

That is why instead of commenting on today’s news I write about the worst defeat suffered by the U.S. Navy in the modern era, which I label from World War II to the present, and hope, maybe beyond hope that it will not happen again, but my guess is that those chances are 50/50, but that there is only a ten percent chance of that.

After Savo Island the U.S. Navy continued  to lose carriers, cruisers, and destroyers at an alarming rate, but the resources of the nation had been fully mobilized to replace the losses tenfold, and repair the damaged ships and return them to action. That could not happen today.

Sadly, I think that my introduction to this article may be longer than the article itself. But such are the dangers we face today. 

Until tomorrow,

Peace,

Padre Steve+ 

On August 8th 1942 the U.S. Task Force supporting the invasion of Guadalcanal was tired. The crews of the ships had been in continuous combat operations conducting naval gunfire support missions, fending off numerous Japanese air attacks and guarding against submarine attacks for two days. The force commanded by Admiral Richmond K. Turner was still unloading materials, equipment and supplies needed by the men of the 1st Marine Division who they had put ashore on the morning of the seventh.

On the afternoon of the eighth Turner was informed by Admiral Frank “Jack” Fletcher that he was pulling his carrier task force out of action. Fletcher alleged that he did not have enough fighter aircraft (79 remaining of an original 98) and as low on fuel. The carriers had only been in action 36 hours and Fletcher’s reasons for withdraw were flimsy. Fletcher pulled out and left Turner and his subordinate commanders the responsibility of remaining in the area without air support with the transports still unloaded, and full of badly needed supplies and equipment.

Gunichi_Mikawa

                                          Admiral Gunichi Mikawa

As the American drama played out, the Japanese moved forces into position to strike the Americans. Admiral Gunichi Mikawa commander of the 8th Fleet and Outer South Seas Force based at Rabaul New Britain quickly assembled a force of 6 heavy cruisers, the 14,000 ton Atago Class Chokai, and the four smaller ships of the Kako Class, the Aoba, Kako, Kinugasa and Furutaka, the light cruisers Yubariand Tenryu and the destroyer Yunagi. Mikawa raised his flag aboard Chokai and the force sped down “the slot” which ran the length of the of the Solomon’s chain mid day on the seventh.

The Americans had warning of their coming. The first sighting was by B-17s before the Japanese forces had reached Rabaul. The second was the elderly U.S. Navy submarine S-38 at 2000 on the 7th when they were 550 miles away not far from Rabaul. This report was discounted because it would not be unusual to find a number of fleet units steaming near a major naval base and fleet headquarters. The last which should have alerted the allies was a sighting by a Royal Australian Air Force patrol aircraft on the morning of the 8th. The crew made numerous attempts to report this, but the common story, which first began with Samuel Elliott Morrison’s account of the battle in his 15 volume History of U.S. Navy Operations in World War Two falsely said that the Australian flight crew made no effort to report the information and flew back to their base, and had tea. American Naval historians writing about the battle have reported this as fact ever since, including me in previous iterations of this article, which I corrected in this article today (8/15/2020). The crew attempted to report it, and their report was even intercepted and reported by the Japanese. Not knowing if their report had been received they made an early return to base and made their report in person to the intelligence officer. This was first reported in 2013, and in 2014, the Chief of the U.S. Navy History Department collaborated the account sole survivor of that aircrew. Hopefully future historians of the battle will do the same. That being said no information was passed to Admiral Turner at Guadalcanal.

The fact is that the allied forces had warning and chose to minimize the threat. Their actions in the following hours displayed an extreme amount of complacency and and failures to take a more active role in preventing any possible Japanese. The American and Australian cruisers all had floatplanes which could have deployed despite a lack of experience in night operations, as the Japanese did so well.

 

USS_Astoria_(CA-34)_off_Guadalcanal_1942

USS Astoria on August 8th off Guadalcanal and USS Chicago (below)

CA-29_Chicago

Turner deployed his support ships to cover the three entrances into what soon would be known as Iron Bottom Sound. He placed the Anti Aircraft Cruiser USS San Juan and Australian Light Cruiser HMAS Hobart to the east with two destroyers under the command of Rear Admiral Norman Scott. To protect the south west entrance into the sound south of Savo Island Turner placed the Heavy Cruisers USS Chicago, HMAS Australia and HMAS Canberra and two destroyers under the command of Rear Admiral R.A.C. Crutchley RN who in theory commanded the screening force. To the north of Savo he deployed the Heavy Cruisers USS Vincennes, USS Astoria and USS Quincy and two destroyers under the tactical direction of Captain Frederick Riefkohl aboard Vincennes. To the west of Savo he placed two destroyers to act as picket ships. Unfortunately these ships radar sets were insufficient and would fail to pick up the approaching enemy.

800px-SavoIslandMap

                                                   Allied Dispositions

During the early evening Turner recalled Crutchley to his flagship for consultations of what to do regarding Fletcher’s retreat. Crutchley came over in his flagship the Australia denuding the southern force of its commander as well as one of its three heavy cruisers. He left the commanding officer of Chicago Captain Howard D. Bode in tactical command but Bode did not have his ship take the lead position in the patrol assuming Crutchley would return bymidnight.

USS_Vincennes_(CA-44)_in_the_Solomons_1942

USS Vincennes (above) and USS Quincy (below)

ca__39_uss_quincy___1942.08.03___1a

HMAS Canberra Sydney Harbour

                                                    HMAS Canberra 

Mikawa launched float planes to scout the locations of the American ships and to provide illumination once the battle began. Some of these aircraft were spotted but no alert measures were taken as many assumed the Japanese to be friendly aircraft. Many commanding officers were asleep or resting away from the bridge of their ships, lookouts were tired and not expecting the Japanese and Condition Two was set in order to provide some of the tired crews a chance to rest.

800px-SavoIslandYubariSearchlight

Light Cruiser Yubari illuminating American cruisers at Savo Island

Admiral Mikawa now new the Allied disposition and ordered his ships to battle stations at 0045. At 004 he sighted and passed astern of USS Blue the southern picket which also failed to detect the Japanese force. Mikawa assumed that the destroyer might have reported his presence, briefly turned north but turned back to his original course when a lookout allegedly spotted a destroyer to his northeast. He gave the order to attack at 0132 and promptly spotted the American destroyer USS Jarvis which had been heavily damaged and without radio communications was making her way toAustralia for repair and passed her after some ships fired torpedoes and raced toward the southern force at 26 knots. With the southern force just a few miles away Mikawa ordered his ships to commence firing at 0136 and at 0138 torpedoes had been launched.

Mikawa’s lookouts spotted the northern group at 0144 and changed course. The maneuver was badly executed and left the Japanese in two columns as they swiftly closed on the Americans. Mikawa’s flagship Chokai launched torpedoes at 0148 and Astoria the cruiser closest to the Japanese set general quarters at 0145 and at 0150 the Japanese illuminated her with searchlights and opened fire. Astoria under the direction of her gunnery officer returned fire at 0152 ½ just before her Captain came to the bridge unaware of the situation. He ordered a cease fire until he could ascertain who he was firing at assuming the Japanese to be friendly ships. He delayed 2 minutes and ordered fires commenced at 0154 but the delay was fatal. Astoria had opened fire on the Chokai which then had time to get the range on the American cruiser and hit her with an 8” salvo which caused fires which provided the other Japanese ships an aiming point.

SavoJapaneseWarArt

Japanese artist depiction of attack on US Navy Cruisers at Savo Island

Astoria was left burning and heavily damaged barely maintaining headway but attempted to fight on scoring a hit on Chokai’s forward turret even as the Japanese opened up on the next cruiser in line the USS Quincy. Quincy caught between the two Japanese columns. Aoba illuminated her with her searchlight and Japanese forces opened fire. The gunnery officer order Quincy to return fire getting two salvos off before her skipper Captain Samuel Moore came to the bridge, briefly ordered a cease fire assuming that he was firing on Americans and turned on his running lights. Quincy was ripped by salvo after salvo which killed Captain Moore and nearly everyone in the pilothouse just as a torpedo ripped into her engineering spaces turning them into a sealed death trap forcing the engineer to shut down the engines. Burning like a Roman candle Quincy was doomed she was ordered abandoned and capsized and sank at 0235. However Quincy did not die in vain, at 0205 two of her 8” shells hit Chokai causing enough damage the Admiral’s chart room that Mikawa would order a withdraw at 0220 which spared the now defenseless American transports.

633px-SavoIslandMap2A

Vincennes, the lead ship and flagship was next in the line of death. Captain Reifkohl order General Quarters sounded not long after the Japanese illuminated the southern group. At 0150 Vincennes was lit up by the searchlights of three Japanese ships which opened fire on her. Vincennes returned fire at 0153 hitting Kinugasa before she was hit starting fires on her scout planes mounted on their catapults. The Japanese mauled Vincennes, three possibly four torpedoes ripped into her as shells put ever gun out of action. At 0215 she was left burning and sinking by the Japanese who soon withdrew from the action. Ordered abandoned she sank at 0250.

Savo_Island canberra

         HMAS Canberra being evacuated by the Patterson and Blue

Canberra struggled against the odds but was abandoned and was sent to the bottom by an American torpedo at 0800. Astoria also struggled for life but the damage was too great and she was abandoned sinking at 1215. Mikawa withdrew up the sound but on his return the Heavy Cruiser Kako 70 miles from home was sunk by torpedoes from the American submarine S-44 sinking in 5 minutes.

hqdefault (1)

The Americans and Australians lost 4 Heavy Cruisers sunk and one heavily damaged. Two destroyers were also damaged. Casualties were heavy; Quincy lost 389 men killed, Vincennes, 342, Astoria, 235, Canberra, 85, Ralph Talbot, 14, Patterson, 10, and Chicago, 2.

It was an unmitigated disaster, an allied force destroyed in less than 30 minutes time. Boards of inquiry were held and Captain Bode hearing that he shouldered much blame killed himself in 1943.

Admiral Turner gave an honest assessment of the defeat:

“The Navy was still obsessed with a strong feeling of technical and mental superiority over the enemy. In spite of ample evidence as to enemy capabilities, most of our officers and men despised the enemy and felt themselves sure victors in all encounters under any circumstances. The net result of all this was a fatal lethargy of mind which induced a confidence without readiness, and a routine acceptance of outworn peacetime standards of conduct. I believe that this psychological factor, as a cause of our defeat, was even more important than the element of surprise”

USSQuincy7

     Wrecks of the USS Quincy, Astoria, Vincennes, and HMAS Canberra

It was a rude awakening to a Navy which had believed that technical advances would give it victory and which  in the words of Admiral Ernest King  was not yet “sufficiently battle minded.” It was the first of many equally bloody battles in the waters around Guadalcanal which in the coming campaign became known as Ironbottom Sound. 

16 Comments

Filed under Foreign Policy, History, imperial japan, leadership, Military, national security, Navy Ships, News and current events, US Navy, World War II at Sea, world war two in the pacific

16 responses to ““Bloody Savo” Is the U.S. Navy Ready for a Beat Down Today?

  1. Pierre Lagacé

    The introduction was perfect since I knew very little of the problems facing the U.S. Navy. I am sure the Chinese and the Russian are aware of them though.
    As for Blood Savo, I remember reading this, but I will read it again to refresh my memory.

  2. Pierre Lagacé

    I have been reading what was shared by a reader on the original post. I think it’s worth reading about the Australian patrol plane…

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-10-27/raaf-veteran-wins-fight-to-clear-crews-name/5844958

    • padresteve

      Morrison wrote too close to the war, as was noted in the article. He also wrote some pretty racist things in regard to U.S. history.

  3. Pierre Lagacé

    Excerpt

    Crew actually sent message while under attack

    Rear Admiral Morison’s account was baseless: Mr Geddes had immediately transmitted the sighting of the Japanese flight.

    He sent the message “in clear” while the Japanese turned their attentions onto the Hudson crew.

    “They sent up two fighters to take care of us,” Mr Geddes recalled.

    “We thought we can’t stand and fiddle around with these people. We’ve got to deliver this intelligence.

    “I got on the radio and tried to contact Milne Bay.”

    The proof was not just that Mr Geddes’ message was picked up by Australian radio operators.

    It was heard by the Japanese themselves, who recorded the intercept in their own military archives.

  4. VERNON PRESCOTT

    I guess we have no doubts in our collective minds that a New Cold War is upon us. Our drastic downsizing of the military would warrant an immediate call up of our Reserve Forces, who, fortunately, are nearly all combat veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. Unfortunately, for the Navy of today, Power Projection wouldn’t work. Too few assets as respects ships, personnel, and aircraft. The Navy would have to conform to a tactical or strategic dense posture, make extensive use of our nuclear submarine force as the “front line”, and look to minimize ship losses. I doubt you would see Marine Expeditionary units deployed, as they have to be logistically supported. Without a strong and protected logistical pipeline ( air and sea), you would be looking at “Dunkirks” at best, “Bataan’s” at their worst.
    —————————————————————————————————
    Now for Guadalcanal and Savo Island

    1. My own view is that with two few carriers available, retiring from the Solomons waters was prudent. We had lost the Lexington and Yorktown. That left the Saratoga, Hornet, Wasp (new to the Pacific and soon to be lost), and the Big E keeping the door shut on Japanese expansion. Some factors I consider valid, follow:
    – Carriers operating within range of Island airfields is not wise.
    – Air defense of your “airfield” ( the carriers) would be the first priority. If you have an inadequate # of fighters for CAP, you are compelled to retire.

    2. The Battle of Savo Island
    – International forces that do not train together usually do not operate well together. Savo Island is reminiscent of the Java Sea Battle.
    – The Japanese trained hard in Night Operations. We did not.
    – The US Cruisers were virtual “Molotov Cocktails” with respect to the Scouting Aircraft and Avgas amidships. Very vulnerable to fires.
    – No real plan or Operations Order for either a day or night action in the waters off Guadalcanal. You know…A “What if ? ” Plan
    – The Allied forces were disbursed. not concentrated.
    – And, Ironbottom Sound, as it is now called, allows for absolutely no maneuverability for large warships.

    3.” Back to the Future”
    – Personally, the US military should be expanded by two Marine and two Army Divisions. Four in total. This allows greater depth of manpower. Screw the expense.
    – Standoff weapons systems should be the priority for the Navy. Both offensive and defensive. Obviously including drones. Smaller, offense-dedicated ships.
    – Allies have to pull their weight with respect to defense spending, and realize that Russia, Iran, and Red China are “here and now” threats.

    SORRY FOR BLOVIATING. BUT YOU CAN TELL I’M RETIRED WITH TIME ON MY HANDS !

    • padresteve

      Not a problem Vernon. I just wonder how survivable some of or ships are and how if the do survive the initial battles if they can ever be repaired quickly due to the decline in our shipyard base.

  5. VERNON PRESCOTT

    Repairs: We used to have floating Drydocks in WWII. Not sure anymore. If I recall correctly, the Navy contracted with a European firm to bring either the USS Cole or the USS Stump back to the U.S. for repairs.( Maybe both after the separate incidents?)

    As far as today’s ships and damage sustainability, I don’t know. They basically have no armor along the lines of WWII warships, lots of aluminum, and starting with the Falklands War, burn furiously. Have we, or our Allies learned? I just don’t know.

    Finally, Repair and Salvage ships: Again, do we have enough ? In WWII, the Trains were right behind the Task Forces, ready to resupply, repair and salvage. Not sure if the U.S. Navy has maintained and improved upon that doctrine..

    I’m an amateur historian on WWII, particularly with respect to the Pacific, where my father served as a Corpsman with the 2d and then later the 6th Marine Divisions. Seven of my eight Uncles served in the various services in all Theaters starting with Guadalcanal and North Africa. ( One had Polio as a child). None were KIA. One was awarded the Purple Heart. And I managed to talk to all and take extensive notes back when they still had their wits. They are all gone now. Me? I’m a Vietnam Vet- a Combat Tanker. Wound up staying 20 years in “This Man’s Army. The joke is that I always dreamed of a naval career. When I was WIA in I Corps in ’71, I wound up at the US Naval Hospital Guam for surgeries ( 2 months), then evacuated to US Naval Hospital St. Albans (Queens, NY) for recuperation ( 45 days). Never ate better or was more pampered before or since. Go figger ! Presently, my youngest son is a CH-53 pilot, still in the Corps, Major- an Afghan Vet.

    Anyway, in 1941 it was Imperial Japan. These days it’s the Peoples Republic of China. Deja Vu….. And I really believe we are not in a position to effectively deter aggression unless both sides suffer catastrophic losses to the point that they can no longer fight a naval war……

    • padresteve

      Vernon, currently the US Navy has two light floating dry docks. They can handle landing craft or patrol boats. A number of civilian yards have floating dry docks big enough to accommodate everything except the carriers. We have a serious lack or dry docking and repair facilities for forward operations. We used to have repair ships and both submarine and destroyer tenders which could do work overseas. That capability died after the Cold War. We need them and we need more simple, mass produced escorts that can provide AAW and ASW capabilities for convoys, and smaller landing ships like the LSTs and LCIs to augment our capacity to send in small numbers of troops for humanitarian ops or evacuations of Americans from countries in turmoil. The marines are trying to figure out the latter but the Navy hasn’t brought up the escorts or repair ship or dry docks.

      • VERNON PRESCOTT

        1. Well, it would seem if a Super Carrier were badly damaged, it would have to be towed to a safe and secure location. or scuttled to avoid capture. And I would imagine it would take 2 or 3 years to repair, so in a short term war, it’s the equivalent of being sunk. 2. The Red Chinese are making inroads throughout the world: A base on the Horn of Africa, cuddling up to the Republic of Kiribati ( the former Gilbert Islands), and in SW Asia among other locations. Loan money, provide free aid, and ask for a base. Simple. Smart. 3. As far as I’m concerned, the U.S. Navy should “reinvent the wheel”, a Class of smaller carriers (15-20,000 tons) that carry perhaps a dozen F-18’s or F-35’s, maximum, and an armed drone contingent. Enough to neutralize any moderately sized target. And an escorting force of overly armed AAW /ASW destroyers dedicated to protecting that floating island. And finally, 4. In a conventional naval shooting war, ships of all combatants will be sunk. The days of salvage and repair are long gone. A good topic for the War Colleges to address. How do you maintain a non-nuclear dominance?

      • padresteve

        I think a reprise of the WWII Essex Class straight Deck but with upgraded flight deck for F-35s and modern electronics, defensive weapons, with LM-2500s replacing steam plant would be idea.

      • VERNON PRESCOTT

        The Navy would have to eat crow or “Humble Pie” before Congress if they were compelled to state that Super Carriers may not be the correct weapons platform in today’s environment. Great for Power Projection or a major strike / counter strike though. However, your statement on the Essex Class merits serious consideration. With today’s automation and technology, a crew of 1000-1500 max, perhaps 25-30,000 Tons total displacement,.21st century propulsion system, with a limited # of attack aircraft but with an offensive drone capability. In fact, several could fill the void of one Super Carrier when it rotates back to Home port for routine overhaul. As I understand it, 2 or 3 Carriers are never deployed due to routine shipyard maintenance / overhaul anyway, so there’s another justification. As respects the Marine Corps, I feel traditional and historic operating procedures need revamping. With satellite intelligence, there is no opportunity for surprise landings- Guadalcanal, Inchon serving as examples. The objective needs to be totally neutralized by Tac Air, and the troops following on by means of helicopters and Ospreys . Logistics and follow on troop deployments would be a challenge. Not sure if the Corps has adapted to the LogPac principle, as the Army has. (“Logistical Packaging” tailored to the Unit it is going to, based on Strength, Immediate Mission, type of weapons systems in their inventory, estimated casualties, duration of the Operation, etc.).
        LONG WINDED AGAIN !!!!

      • padresteve

        WII Long hull Essex class was about 27,000 tons. Take off all the AA guns, redesign Island structure to accommodate the modern radars, no need for well deck, like the America has shown. Make Marines lighter and you could have a CV variant and an LPH variant, as was done with some of the straight deck Essex class in the 1950s. CV would have F-35s, and ASW Helicopters, LPH would mainly have MV-22s and MH-53s, latest USMC Super-Cobras, and a flight of no more than 6 F-35s. Essex class as built had 2 1/2 in armored hanger deck, and 4-6” main belt armor. If the flight deck was modified to support the heat of the F-35 engines it could also be armored, and for better sea keeping the hurricane bow. I am sure that 3-4 could be constructed in lieu of a single Ford Class CVN. Numbers do matter in a short war, battle casualties, even if repairable won’t be back in action fast enough. The new Essex Class, would be as tough as their predecessors, have good range and speed, and could pack a punch. In fact I would set aside part of the flight deck for VLS launchers. I would also build several of the Arsenal ships, which would have carried 500-1000 VLS tubes for Tomahawks, and escort with the one of the new FFGs and a couple LCS ships. It would be a major cultural shift, and difficult for the Navy, but necessary.

  6. You did an outstanding job here, Steve.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s