The Unending Reality Of Endlösung: The Legacy of Adolf Eichmann and those Who Embrace Race Hatred


Friends of Padre Steve’s World,

On June 1st 1962 Adolf Eichmann was hanged in Israel for his crimes of mass murder and genocide. His appearance in the court where he portrayed himself as a functionary and bureaucrat who was repulsed by bloodshed and only following orders. So convincing was his act that Hannah Arendt wrote of him:

“The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal. From the viewpoint of our legal institutions and of our moral standards of judgment, this normality was much more terrifying than all the atrocities put together, for it implied — as had been said at Nuremberg over and over again by the defendants and their counsels — that this new type of criminal, who is in actual fact hostis generis humani, commits his crimes under circumstances that make it well-nigh impossible for him to know or to feel that he is doing wrong.”

Unfortunately there are people such as Arendt described, but Eichmann was not one of them. She wrote her commentary having only attended parts of the trial, but what she saw convinced her that Eichmann was ordinary and normal. She was convinced by his appearance and presentation at the trial that he was not the man who ran roughshod over Jews as well as German officials in order to execute the Final Solution. That phrase, “the banality of evil” has often been used to provide an alibi for men and women who wholeheartedly participated in the extermination of the Jews and others deemed to be less than human regardless of whether they were desk bound bureaucrats in Berlin, managers of the extermination camps, or the members of the Einsatzgruppen, the Ordungspolizei, or the Wehrmacht who systematically exterminated millions of people up close and personal.

Eichamnn was a true believer in the Nazi system and its desire to exterminate the Jews from the earth and he enjoyed what he did. He not only acted on orders but he anticipated them, as he told William Sassen in an interview while living undercover in Argentina in the 1950s:

“If we would have killed 10.3 million Jews, then I would be satisfied and would say, good, we annihilated an enemy. … I wasn’t only issued orders, in this case I’d have been a moron, but I rather anticipated, I was an idealist.”

Eichmann began his career by persecuting the Jews of Vienna but following the Wansee Conference he was entrusted by Reinhard Heydrich with overseeing the mechanics of implementing the Final Solution. He was only an SS Lieutenant Colonel but he wielded his power with such effect that he could ensure that Nazi functionaries senior to him did his bidding in regard to the Jews, He told Sassen:

“They knew me wherever I went. Through the press, the name Eichmann had emerged as a symbol…. In any case, the word Jew … was irreversibly linked with the word Eichmann. Much more power … was attributed to me than I actually had.”

Eichmann summed up the attitude of many when he said regarding his work to deport hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz in in just a few weeks during the fall of 1944, “Whether they were bank directors or mental cases, the people who were loaded on those trains meant nothing to me.” Speaking to Willem Sassen in 1957 Eichmann reveled in that accomplishment, “It was an achievement that was never matched before or since.” Eichmann also enjoyed leading his victims on, pretending that he might listen, and they might change his mind. Eichmann was proud of what he did. He told his staff, “I will leap into my grave laughing because the feeling that I have five million human beings on my conscience is for me a source of extraordinary satisfaction.”

Some of the 437,000 Hungarian Jews Being Sent to Auschwitz

His greatest accomplishment of genocide was in Hungary between March and May of 1944 when he orchestrated the “evacuation” of 437,000 Jews to Auschwitz, of which nearly 400,000 were exterminated in that camps massive gas chambers. His greatest regret was that Himmler and others, realizing that the war was lost were now trying to find ways to deal with the Allies using the Jews as bargaining chips. They put an end to his campaign leaving half of Hungary’s Jews alive, something that he detested to the end of his life for his superiors had taken away his reason for being.

Eichmann twisted language in a perverse manner to both glorify and justify his inhumanity. Bettina Stangneth, wrote in her book Eichmann Before Jerusalem:

“The language becomes entirely perverted where Eichmann turns metaphors on their heads, talking about expulsion and murder using gentle images of life. An institution for forced emigration was his “first child,” where he was able to “be creative in my work.” All the individual acts of robbery and expulsion that took place in Austria were committed to “provide [the country] with injections of Jewish solutions.” Even exterminations and deportations were “born”. This was why he felt so superfluous in Budapest, when he was forced to stop deporting people to Auschwitz: “As far as I know, I couldn’t have done anything fruitful anymore” … In Eichmann’s language, he didn’t send people to the death camps; the camps were “fed with material”.

Adolf Eichmann went to his death unrepentant and there is nothing to be mourned on this anniversary of his death, other than the fact that there are people who are much like him today. That is the terrifying reality. Some may be those faceless bureaucrats, but too many others would easily become killers. As Timothy Snyder noted:

“The European history of the twentieth century shows us that societies can break, democracies can fall, ethics can collapse, and ordinary men can find themselves standing over death pits with guns in their hands. It would serve us well today to understand why.”

Christopher Browning wrote in his book Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Holocaust in Poland:

“I fear that we live in a world in which war and racism are ubiquitous, in which the powers of government mobilization and legitimization are powerful and increasing, in which a sense of personal responsibility is increasingly attenuated by specialization and bureaucratization, and in which the peer group exerts tremendous pressures on behavior and sets moral norms. In such a world, I fear, modern governments that wish to commit mass murder will seldom fail in their efforts for being unable to induce “ordinary men” to become their “willing executioners.”

In such a world it is all too important that we never forget, especially now when we could be watching it begin all over again. Eichmann may be dead but he lives on and we must always remain vigilant, or the specter of the Holocaust will rise again, quite possibly in countries that are considered civilized and freedom loving, like the United States.

Never forget,


Padre Steve+


Filed under History, holocaust, nazi germany, Political Commentary, war crimes, world war two in europe

3 responses to “The Unending Reality Of Endlösung: The Legacy of Adolf Eichmann and those Who Embrace Race Hatred

  1. Woebegone but Hopeful

    He got his just deserts. Ended his days being presided over by a nation of Jews. Payback can be a….Well we know the rest

  2. Steven

    This is simultaneously one of the most, and one of the least, worrying aspects of genocidal policies.

    The person who is a True Believer is also the person who is easier to work against—they are as crazy as they sound. It is easier to tell one’s soldiers to disobey an order from such a person because it **seems** unlawful, filled as it is with “political” talk and phrases of fervent belief. It is, of course, dangerous to defy such people, because they are only enabled by the passivity of the majority and the policy of those in positions of higher authority, but it gives one a clear line.

    Had Eichmann been the “colourless bureaucrat” he is often portrayed as—in movies and documentaries especially—he would have presented a much more difficult situation. Here the criminal orders are cast in everyday military terminology, expressed as military necessities, and dressed up with assurances of understanding and gratitude; the nation knows how difficult these acts are for decent young men, and it is forever grateful for their endurance and devotion to duty. Sometimes this is made tangible by the granting of special rations, bonuses, leaves, etc…

    I mentioned in a previous post that many people’s idea of “war crimes” crosses well past what is commonplace in war. This is the kind of thing that is clear and should be simple—but of course, it’s not. The situation vis-a-vis immigration and the use of the Armed Forces for customs and border enforcement in the US shows that issue up quite starkly, while the covering up of the name of the DDG John S. McCain shows the consequences of the accompanying erosion of military and political authority.

    The problem is that it actually **is** the duty of the Armed Forces to protect the nation’s borders. Thus chasing immigrants can be cast to private soldiers as part of their duty to protect the nation. In fact and in law, the USA has legally constituted authorities charged with the enforcement of the nation’s customs and immigration laws—it has long been considered a law enforcement task, not a military (defence) task. Yet because civilian control of the military is a key value of the US Armed Forces, and despite having sword to defend and protect the Constitution—and nothing else—the upper echelon of the Armed Forces see their duty as obedience to civilian authority, which over the years since WWII has become obedience to the President and the Administration, rather than obedience to the Constitution and the National Command Authority.

    This leads to the very thing our military’s ethos is supposed to provide a counterweight to—politicising the military. Now the US 7th Fleet is issuing orders to conceal the name of a warship to protect the vanity of a single person. And for those inclined to believe the US Navy’s belated assurances that the orders were “not implemented”—visual evidence and statements of persons on-site notwithstanding—it doesn’t matter; what matters is that the orders were issued, and the intent was to obey them until they were specifically countermanded (if, in fact, they were). Anyone who ever served knows the Navy attempted to conceal that ship—there is no “maintenance” requiring a tarp over the ship’s name on the brow, nor was there any need to move a barge aft to cover the stern. But whether or not one believes the actions or lack thereof, the orders and follow-up on those orders issued by 7th Fleet shows that the Navy, from the CNO, through the Pacific Fleet Commander, 7th Fleet Commander, their staffs, to the commander and staffs of the yard at Yokosuka (YAH-koo-sss-KAH) Navy Yard, understood that the men and women serving aboard—and the once-honoured memory of three generations of—John S. McCain, are shamful and must be hidden.

    It is more important to protect the vanity of a coward than defend the reputation of three generations of naval heroes—and JSM III was the real kind of hero, not just a veteran, not merely a guy who served, but a man who walked his talk in the face of privation, harassment, and torture. This is exactly the situation where lines get crossed—which they did, by the way, which you could know simply by asking any of the crew (clearly, not the officers or senior enlisted ranks, they care more about kissing ass than their own)—and things which were believed unthinkable are simply done “as ordered”.

    I never thought that would happen. I never thought Americans would allow the Armed Forces to operate in a domestic police role without any over-arching need being present. I never thought we would create refugee camps on American soil and call them detention centres. I never thought we would become the land of the rich and home of the sheep.

    Joke’s on me.

    • padresteve

      I never thought it would happen either. For three and a half years I taught ethics at the Joint Forces Staff College. Many of my students got the message, many being STEM majors had never explored ethics and history. However there were a number who I really believe might be capable of ordering or carrying out war crimes. Of course we had our Saudi exchange students who used their presentations to justify their actions in Yemen. All of my students were Majors/LCDRs to Colonels and Navy Captains. I also had CIA, DIA, NSA, and State Department students, and other allied officers. We live in dangerous times, when up is down.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s