The Pride of the Regina Marina: The Vittorio Veneto Class Battleships

Vittorio Veneto and Littorio

This is the first in a series of five articles on the battleships built under the provision of the Washington and London Naval Treaty limitations in the 1930s. I am not including the ships which were completed in the immediate aftermath of the Washington Treaty limitations. This series looks at the modern battleships that the World War II combatants would produce in the 1930s which saw service in the war. Part one covers the Italian Vittorio Veneto class, Part Two the French Dunkerque and Richelieu Classes, Part Three the British King George V Class and Part Four the American North Carolina and South Dakota Classes. I have already published the final part which covers the German Scharnhorst Class entitled Power and Beauty the Battle Cruisers Scharnhorst and Gneisenau The German Bismarck, Japanese Yamato, British Vanguard and American Iowa Classes will be covered in a subsequent series.

Technically many of these ships were constructed after the expiration of the treaties but since most of the navies at least attempted to maintain a façade of compliance with them most were officially listed as complying with the treaty restrictions.

The Washington Treaty placed a limit on the displacement and armament of battleships. The London Treaty continued them which limited the displacement of new ships to 35,000 tons with the main battery being limited to 16” guns. Each of the treaty signatories as well as the Germans who had been bound by the much more stringent Treaty of Versailles restrictions endeavored to build to the limit of the treaty and if possible skirt the limitations in terms of displacement which allowed them to increase protection as well as more powerful engineering plants.

The Royal Italian Navy had not completed a battleship design since the Andria Doria Class which were constructed between 1912 and 1915 and modernized given an extensive modernization between 1937 and 1940.  A subsequent class the Francesco Caracciolo class was started during the First World War but no ships of the class were completed.

In the 1930s a new naval arms race was underway in the Mediterranean as the French Navy had begun a new class of Fast Battleships, the Dunkerque class which were designed to defeat the German Deutschland class “pocket battleships” and the follow on Richelieu Class. Mussolini saw the new French ships as a threat to the control of the Mediterranean and ordered the construction of a new class of battleships to help Italy achieve naval dominance in the Mediterranean.

The new ships were of a breathtaking design, large, fast and heavily armed officially listed as meeting the prescribed treaty limit of 35,000 tons they actually would displace 41,177 tons standard displacement and 45,963 tons full load. Armed with a main battery of 9 15” guns in triple turrets and a secondary armament of 12 6” and 12 3.5” guns along with 20 37mm and 30 20mm anti-aircraft guns and capable of 29 knots in service and with a relatively short range of 3900 miles at 20 knots they were formidable ships for operations in the Mediterranean. They were well protected although their Pugliese torpedo defense system proved inferior to traditional designs.

Their main armament though formidable was not without its flaws. The 15” guns had a very long range of 42 km or 26.6 miles and high muzzle velocity of 2900 fps. The high muzzle velocity led to a barrel life of only about half that of their counterparts and inconsistent shell fall patterns.  The guns also suffered from a slow rate of fire of only 1.3 rounds per gun a minute.

The Ships:

Vittorio Veneto in 1943

Vittorio Veneto: The Vittorio Veneto was laid down 1934 along with her sister the Littorio and was launched on 25 July 1937 and commissioned on 28 April 1940. She would see action numerous times and give a good account of herself against the British taking part in 56 war missions. She fought at the Battle of Cape Spartivento (Teulada) where she fired 19 salvos to drive off a 7 ship British cruiser squadron in a pitched battle that also included the battleship HMS Ramillies and battle cruiser HMS Renown. In 1941 she took part in the Battle of Cape Matapan where she was damaged by an aerial torpedo after driving off a British cruiser squadron. After repairs she was back in action and on 15 June 1942 participated in the Battle of Mid-June, where she and her sister ship Littorio successfully fenced off a large British convoy from Alexandria by their mere presence at sea.  She was also the first Italian battleship equipped with radar. She surrendered with the Italian fleet to the Allies on 8 September 1943 surviving furious German air attacks. She was interred at the Great Bitter Lakes in the Suez Canal. After the war she taken as war compensation and was returned to Italy and scrapped beginning in 1948.

Littorio

Littorio (later Italia): Littorio was laid down in 1934 and launched on 22 August 1937 and commissioned on 6 May 1940.  She participated in 43 operations including the Battle of Sirte and several actions against British convoys.  Following the Battle of Mid-June she was struck by an aerial torpedo dropped by a Wellington bomber. She was repaired and upon the removal of Mussolini from power was renamed Italia and surrendered with the Italian Fleet on 8 September 1943 being damaged by a Fritz-X radio controlled bomb. With her sister Vittorio Veneto she was interred in the Great Bitter Lake and was returned to Italy where she was decommissioned and scrapped beginning in 1948.

Roma

Roma: Roma was laid down 18 September 1938, launched on 9 June 1940 and commissioned 14 June 1942.  Despite her addition to the fleet she was not deployed due to a fuel shortage. She sailed with the Italian Fleet to surrender on 8 June under the guise of the fleet sailing to attack the Allied invasion fleet off Salerno. The Germans discovering the ruse launched air attacks by Dornier Do-217s armed with Fritz-X radio controlled bombs attacked the fleet as it transited the Strait of Bonafacio.

Roma exploding after being hit by Fritz-X radio guided bomb

Roma was hit by two of the missiles the first which flooded two boiler rooms and the aft engine room.  She was hit soon after by a second Fritz-X which hit in the forward engine room causing catastrophic damage and igniting the number two turret magazine blowing the turret off the ship and causing the ship to capsize and break in two as she sank carrying 1255 of her crew including Admiral Carlo Bergamini to their death. Roma was the first ship sunk by a radio controlled bomb, the forerunner of our current air launched anti-ship missiles.

The Fritz-X Radio Guided Bomb

Impero: Impero was laid down but never completed and scrapped after the war.

The Vittorio Veneto class was a sound design and operationally successful against the Royal Navy and the brave sailors of the Regina Marina who manned these fine ships should not be forgotten.

Advertisements

10 Comments

Filed under History, Military, Navy Ships, world war two in europe

10 responses to “The Pride of the Regina Marina: The Vittorio Veneto Class Battleships

  1. John Erickson

    Very well done, Padre. An outstanding tribute to a truly beautiful class of ships. It’s a pity their torpedo defence system was such a horrific failure, otherwise they would have given the Royal Navy a lot of trouble.

  2. Pingback: French Firepower Forward: The unrealized potential of the Dunkerque and Richelieu Class Battleships | Padresteve's World…Musings of a Passionate Moderate

  3. Pingback: British Bulwarks: The King George V Class Battleships | Padresteve's World…Musings of a Passionate Moderate

  4. Pingback: The Next Generation: The North Carolina Class Battleships | Padresteve's World…Musings of a Passionate Moderate

  5. Piet

    Ive read a few books on the mediteranian naval battles of world war 2-The British forces generaly fought agressively sending an un-willing Italian participant heading for their home ports as fast as possible-damn even when it was royal navy 6 inch light cruisers against the battleships and 8 inch cruisers no victorys where made-Taranto -spartivento-matapan the British generaly defeated the italians -the action between guilio cesare and warspite was where the warspite landed a direct hit at a record 27000 yards this long range hit with big guns on a manouvering enemy battleship was a record never broken by the way-the best success of the italians was queen elizabeth and valiant in alexandria harbour where frogmen mined the ships valiant was out of action for 2-3 months Queen Elizabeth for 6-8 months.

    • Tim Chirnin

      Obviously you feel the need to adhere to the old stereotypes perpetrated by the Allied propaganda of ww2 and which continues although there are many books written in the past few years which give a more balanced picture. It is apparent by your comments that you haven’t read them. If you had read just the commentary on this site you would see that there were many instances of the british turning tail and fleeing from the fight. What you say about the british generally winning most of the battles is true as that is an indisbutable fact. Nevertheless it is not as you so simply put it to portray the Italian fleet as turning tail in many instances and by no means all and leaving the encounter .. Every navy I know of leaves port with bunkers full to the hilt, not the Italian Navy which many times was on the verge of running out of fuel during battle. It was Mussolini’s belief that the war would be over in 3 months and had very little fuel reserves. One notable instance is the Vittorio Veneto which almost ran out at Matapan. THe other reason was the Italian fear of air attack from the british carriers and Italy had none. Mussolini, a pathetic military mind, thought Italian planes would be available to intercept the British from Italian land bases. Mussolini said Italy itself was the only aircraft carrier needed , he found out differently when the planes could not be dispatched in time to save the day such as at Matapan. Italy then began to construct aircraft carriers but too late. I always wonder how the Brits didn’t overtake the Italian ships with their planes, maybe the Brits were just being magnanimous in not pursuing..Third was the preposterous Italian belief that they should at all costs have a fleet in being and never risk their ships. Perhaps it was for bargaining purposes with the Allies because they suffered no German illusions about victory. Unfortunately that bargaining power never manifested itself. It was Mussolini who led the Italians and the Italian military knew its limitations, they were guilty of following orders in spite of what they knew would be defeat. They lost 381,000 military dead, which proportionate to the U.S. population of today would be America losing 2.904,000.

      • padresteve

        Tim,
        I have actually read much recent scholarship and you miss the point of the article. I have written other articles about the overall problems with the Italian war machine and those extended to the Navy. I have not in any way denigrated the brave men that fought for Italy and had to fight under commanders that were many times less brave than them and a industrial base that often provided them terrible weapons, bad ammunition and because of geography and lack of preparedness not enough fuel. I also know that every country, Allied and Axis had issues and if you read my other writings regarding the navies and ships of those countries you will see that I am very even handed regarding all of issues that you take offense at in my critique of the Italian Navy.

      • Tim Chirnin

        To Padresteve, I am sorry that you took my comments as being directed to you as they were not meant to be so. I meant those comments for ‘Piet” who commented on Oct.26, 2011. Your commentary on the Italian Navy is very complimentary and very uncommon among many writers on that particular subject. I am sure that as a writer on the subject you are aware that many writers resort to the tired and worn old WW2 propaganda stereotypes. Again please accept my apologies and also my appreciation for your very fine treatment of the subject.

  6. Piet

    Warspite Guilio Cesare correction 26000 yards record for hitting another battleship manoevering at sea.
    correction Queen Elizabeth out of action for 12-18 months + Valiant about 6 months!The Alexandria Frogmen/Chariot/myale action was much more successful than any other Italian Navy action

  7. Tim Chirnin

    Hi Padre, just one correction should be made as to the Italian designation for its Navy. It should be Regia Marina instead of Regina Marina.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s